<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Really, What&#039;s the Point of the 2000 Bloggers Experiment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dmiracle.com/marketing-your-business/really-whats-the-point-of-the-2000-bloggers-experiment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dmiracle.com/blog-marketing/really-whats-the-point-of-the-2000-bloggers-experiment/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=really-whats-the-point-of-the-2000-bloggers-experiment</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:42:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawud Miracle</title>
		<link>http://dmiracle.com/blog-marketing/really-whats-the-point-of-the-2000-bloggers-experiment/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawud Miracle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthywebdesign.com/marketing-your-business/really-whats-the-point-of-the-2000-bloggers-experiment/#comment-374</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Hemant&lt;/strong&gt;

I thought the same thing. What I came to learn is that getting traffic and gaining readers is not necessarily the same thing. I&#039;ve gained far more readers through my post writing and commenting on other blog posts than I did with 2000 Bloggers. I certainly gained more feed subscribers writing and commenting than I did during the 2000 Bloggers.

Really, the way to build traffic is first through great content, second through linking out from your content to other blogs, and third, commenting on other blogs to draw interest in yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hemant</strong></p>
<p>I thought the same thing. What I came to learn is that getting traffic and gaining readers is not necessarily the same thing. I&#8217;ve gained far more readers through my post writing and commenting on other blog posts than I did with 2000 Bloggers. I certainly gained more feed subscribers writing and commenting than I did during the 2000 Bloggers.</p>
<p>Really, the way to build traffic is first through great content, second through linking out from your content to other blogs, and third, commenting on other blogs to draw interest in yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hemant Velury</title>
		<link>http://dmiracle.com/blog-marketing/really-whats-the-point-of-the-2000-bloggers-experiment/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Hemant Velury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthywebdesign.com/marketing-your-business/really-whats-the-point-of-the-2000-bloggers-experiment/#comment-373</guid>
		<description>While I agree with your thoughts - How do I increase traffic to my site? I have not yet attempted the 2000 bloggers thingy - I am blogging to get traffic and to get to know a few folks... But somehow its not happening - Agree im a greenhorn at this - but what is the choice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree with your thoughts &#8211; How do I increase traffic to my site? I have not yet attempted the 2000 bloggers thingy &#8211; I am blogging to get traffic and to get to know a few folks&#8230; But somehow its not happening &#8211; Agree im a greenhorn at this &#8211; but what is the choice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jf.sellsius</title>
		<link>http://dmiracle.com/blog-marketing/really-whats-the-point-of-the-2000-bloggers-experiment/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>jf.sellsius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 23:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthywebdesign.com/marketing-your-business/really-whats-the-point-of-the-2000-bloggers-experiment/#comment-372</guid>
		<description>Blogs existed before Technorati.  I&#039;d say it&#039;s not their responsibility to bend to Technorati&#039;s system. If Technorati doesn&#039;t like it that their system counted these links, that seems to be Technorati&#039;s problem IMO. Many bloggers are &quot;soul bloggers&quot;, not counting links or popularity or any of the other brass rings others are reaching for.
http://tinyurl.com/2kytso</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogs existed before Technorati.  I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s not their responsibility to bend to Technorati&#8217;s system. If Technorati doesn&#8217;t like it that their system counted these links, that seems to be Technorati&#8217;s problem IMO. Many bloggers are &#8220;soul bloggers&#8221;, not counting links or popularity or any of the other brass rings others are reaching for.<br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/2kytso" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2kytso</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Do I Blog - Healthy WebDesign - Developing and Building Successful Websites for Independent Professionals</title>
		<link>http://dmiracle.com/blog-marketing/really-whats-the-point-of-the-2000-bloggers-experiment/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Do I Blog - Healthy WebDesign - Developing and Building Successful Websites for Independent Professionals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthywebdesign.com/marketing-your-business/really-whats-the-point-of-the-2000-bloggers-experiment/#comment-371</guid>
		<description>[...] Yeah, I know, I said I wasn&#8217;t interested in memes any longer. Yet tagging memes seems so much more sensible than what happened with the 2000 Blogger meme. Here, I get to share a few of my favorite bloggers and make them known to others. A win-win in all directions. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yeah, I know, I said I wasn&#8217;t interested in memes any longer. Yet tagging memes seems so much more sensible than what happened with the 2000 Blogger meme. Here, I get to share a few of my favorite bloggers and make them known to others. A win-win in all directions. [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Travis Elliott and the Two-Sided Coin &#187; Blog Archive &#187; In the world of blogs, artificial links are Cancer</title>
		<link>http://dmiracle.com/blog-marketing/really-whats-the-point-of-the-2000-bloggers-experiment/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Travis Elliott and the Two-Sided Coin &#187; Blog Archive &#187; In the world of blogs, artificial links are Cancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 23:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthywebdesign.com/marketing-your-business/really-whats-the-point-of-the-2000-bloggers-experiment/#comment-370</guid>
		<description>[...] In the world of blogging, there wasÂ a recent event that artificially increased theÂ number of links to a number of blogs.Â  It was theÂ &#8221;2000 Bloggers&#8221; project,Â and it was added to long list ofÂ other things that bloggers do to try and get as many people as possible to link to their sites. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the world of blogging, there wasÂ a recent event that artificially increased theÂ number of links to a number of blogs.Â  It was theÂ &#8221;2000 Bloggers&#8221; project,Â and it was added to long list ofÂ other things that bloggers do to try and get as many people as possible to link to their sites. [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawud Miracle</title>
		<link>http://dmiracle.com/blog-marketing/really-whats-the-point-of-the-2000-bloggers-experiment/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawud Miracle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 18:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthywebdesign.com/marketing-your-business/really-whats-the-point-of-the-2000-bloggers-experiment/#comment-369</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Travis&lt;/strong&gt;

Yeah. I would say that the positives of the blogosphere are far outweighing the negatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Travis</strong></p>
<p>Yeah. I would say that the positives of the blogosphere are far outweighing the negatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Travis Elliott</title>
		<link>http://dmiracle.com/blog-marketing/really-whats-the-point-of-the-2000-bloggers-experiment/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Travis Elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 15:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthywebdesign.com/marketing-your-business/really-whats-the-point-of-the-2000-bloggers-experiment/#comment-368</guid>
		<description>I canâ€™t help but think of the similarities between artificial linking and, wellâ€¦cancer.

As Michael Weschâ€™s video illustrates, the links that make up the web have a certain similarity to our own body and mind. And in my last post on my own blog that the connections throughout the internet are really similar to the connections in our own brains.

But itâ€™s not just in our brains, our bodies are created and defined by all of the relationships among all of the different parts- hormonal, structural, electrical, sub-atomic, etc.

This situation works well as long as the connections have meaning and the functions that result are helpful to the overall body.

A cancer grows when it starts manipulating the bodyâ€™s resources for its own gain. Blood vessel growth and sugar intake are increased solely for the good of cancer.

Isnâ€™t that kind of similar to this 2000 bloggers thing? And, I suppose, the other kinds of linkbaiting and buying of links that are referenced in these comments?

But before we get too worried about the health of the blogosphere, I think the response from the blogging community has been instructive.

Cancer arises in your own body every day. Millions of times per day, in fact. Your immune system simply finds it and kills it. End of story, until your overall health is depressed enough to let it grow. Or until a cancer comes along that is particularly aggressive.

It seems to me that the self-regulation of the internet (consider the success of Wikipedia) is working well, and it is another indication that what we are building on internet servers around the world is getting more and more alive by the minute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I canâ€™t help but think of the similarities between artificial linking and, wellâ€¦cancer.</p>
<p>As Michael Weschâ€™s video illustrates, the links that make up the web have a certain similarity to our own body and mind. And in my last post on my own blog that the connections throughout the internet are really similar to the connections in our own brains.</p>
<p>But itâ€™s not just in our brains, our bodies are created and defined by all of the relationships among all of the different parts- hormonal, structural, electrical, sub-atomic, etc.</p>
<p>This situation works well as long as the connections have meaning and the functions that result are helpful to the overall body.</p>
<p>A cancer grows when it starts manipulating the bodyâ€™s resources for its own gain. Blood vessel growth and sugar intake are increased solely for the good of cancer.</p>
<p>Isnâ€™t that kind of similar to this 2000 bloggers thing? And, I suppose, the other kinds of linkbaiting and buying of links that are referenced in these comments?</p>
<p>But before we get too worried about the health of the blogosphere, I think the response from the blogging community has been instructive.</p>
<p>Cancer arises in your own body every day. Millions of times per day, in fact. Your immune system simply finds it and kills it. End of story, until your overall health is depressed enough to let it grow. Or until a cancer comes along that is particularly aggressive.</p>
<p>It seems to me that the self-regulation of the internet (consider the success of Wikipedia) is working well, and it is another indication that what we are building on internet servers around the world is getting more and more alive by the minute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawud Miracle</title>
		<link>http://dmiracle.com/blog-marketing/really-whats-the-point-of-the-2000-bloggers-experiment/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawud Miracle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 12:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthywebdesign.com/marketing-your-business/really-whats-the-point-of-the-2000-bloggers-experiment/#comment-367</guid>
		<description>Exactly Chris. I was using Technorati for incoming links as well. Now I have to wade through this mess these links with [img Dawud Miracle] in it just to find legitimate links people are making to my blog.

I use &lt;a href=&quot;http://alexa.com/site/ds/top_500 rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Alexa&#039;s Traffic Ranking Search&lt;/a&gt; too. Interesting to watch how blogging has so quickly changed my ranking. Shows me that one major benefit of blogging is growing traffic to my site. Something that is much more challenging with a static, brochure-style site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly Chris. I was using Technorati for incoming links as well. Now I have to wade through this mess these links with [img Dawud Miracle] in it just to find legitimate links people are making to my blog.</p>
<p>I use <a href="http://alexa.com/site/ds/top_500 rel="nofollow">Alexa&#8217;s Traffic Ranking Search</a> too. Interesting to watch how blogging has so quickly changed my ranking. Shows me that one major benefit of blogging is growing traffic to my site. Something that is much more challenging with a static, brochure-style site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Brown</title>
		<link>http://dmiracle.com/blog-marketing/really-whats-the-point-of-the-2000-bloggers-experiment/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 10:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthywebdesign.com/marketing-your-business/really-whats-the-point-of-the-2000-bloggers-experiment/#comment-366</guid>
		<description>I too made the mistake of the 2000 bloggers submit.  I use Technorati to see who linked to me... what did they say, good? bad? indifferent?  Should I respond?

The problem with the 2000 is it has made a mess of seeing who links to you.

From a ranking standpoint, a traffic standpoint, Alexa is much better.  I like to see who comes thru regularly, so I use MyBlogLog for that.

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too made the mistake of the 2000 bloggers submit.  I use Technorati to see who linked to me&#8230; what did they say, good? bad? indifferent?  Should I respond?</p>
<p>The problem with the 2000 is it has made a mess of seeing who links to you.</p>
<p>From a ranking standpoint, a traffic standpoint, Alexa is much better.  I like to see who comes thru regularly, so I use MyBlogLog for that.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawud Miracle</title>
		<link>http://dmiracle.com/blog-marketing/really-whats-the-point-of-the-2000-bloggers-experiment/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawud Miracle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 15:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthywebdesign.com/marketing-your-business/really-whats-the-point-of-the-2000-bloggers-experiment/#comment-365</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Daniel&lt;/strong&gt;

As I said above, I don&#039;t know Tino&#039;s motivation. I&#039;d like to think it was a fun experiment too. But maybe he was looking to create a ton of buzz around his blog - which he&#039;s done. The interesting this is that he has the most to gain from 2000 Bloggers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Daniel</strong></p>
<p>As I said above, I don&#8217;t know Tino&#8217;s motivation. I&#8217;d like to think it was a fun experiment too. But maybe he was looking to create a ton of buzz around his blog &#8211; which he&#8217;s done. The interesting this is that he has the most to gain from 2000 Bloggers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

