June 6, 2007 by Dawud Miracle 16 Comments Share this:Tweet Related posts: Songs That Make My Heart Sing Do You Still Use Internet Explorer? Google’s Eric Schmidt Defines Web 3.0 The Perfect Husband Small Business Marketing Advice: Should You Use Subliminal Advertising? Reader InteractionsComments Jean Browman says June 6, 2007 at 4:52 pm “…is it about the software we use or the experience our users have? Where does the conversation happen?” Sure, the conversation happens interacting with the user, but that doesn’t mean we can’t enjoy the technical challenges, too. I couldn’t do most of the volunteer work I do if I hadn’t been willing to go through the steep learning curve for my Adobe products. And I’m still expanding my knowledge so I have more tools at my fingertips. It’s not an either/or thing. For me it’s about balance. Reply Lyle Lachmuth - The Unsticking Coach says June 6, 2007 at 5:13 pm Yep, Steve has taste and Bill is an Engineer. It’s like the old joke, “You can always tell an engineer… but you can’t tell ’em much.” I love Macs. But, having worked on IBM based equipment all my life, 40+ years now, I feel permanently conditioned to think in DOS, MVS, and all those ‘linear, left-brain’ ways. Sniff. It just feels so painful to change. Yeah. I know that’s just an ‘excuse’ but it works for me. 😉 LL Reply Mike Rohde says June 6, 2007 at 2:20 pm The entire video and an audio podcast version are now available in the iTunes store for free, if having to watch little chunks bugs anyone as much as it did me. 🙂 Reply Dawud Miracle says June 6, 2007 at 3:22 pm Mike, Thanks. I just downloaded the podcast and the 1GB vCast is on its way. I thought this interview was a classic and definitely want to keep it around the watch again. Reply Dawud Miracle says June 6, 2007 at 3:53 pm NOTE, I just added direct links to the iTunes Music store for both the podcast and the vcast. Reply Dawud Miracle says June 6, 2007 at 5:48 pm Jean, Sure. I simply think of technology as being a means for conversation and relationship. Lyle, I know. I was raised on DOS and later Windows. I always thought the Mac as inferior. Then I was forced to use one – on OS 9 – to, oddly enough, build my first couple of websites. It took no time to fall in love with the Mac. And now I’ve never looked back. Of course, I have XP on my Mac for testing sites and training clients. But that’s really it. The difference for me is in the user experience. What I learned about myself from using a Mac is that I never consider how important it was before. I quite literally enjoy using my Mac – everyday. But I don’t enjoy using Windows when I have too. Reply Adam Kayce : Monk At Work says June 6, 2007 at 10:00 pm “is it about the software we use or the experience our users have?” Great observation. That’s the crux of it right there, and why I so happily switched back to Mac a few years ago (from a dell-laden gulag… oh, don’t take me back there…) I just downloaded the video, and will give it a look-see asap. Oh, and Lyle — do it, man, switch back! It’s easy, and you’ll be amazed you stayed away for so long. There’s really no reason, if your heart’s in Macland. (and hey, for pc-lovers, don’t get me wrong; if your heart is there, enjoy yourself. The world’s big enough for us all to have our own tribe…) Reply Dawud Miracle says June 6, 2007 at 11:02 pm Adam, I really think it’s the user experience that separates Apple from Microsoft. Are Macs better? I don’t know. They are for me. But for someone else??? I can tell you that the days of having no software for the Mac or compatibility problems between Mac and Windows is far over. They are almost fully compatible. Macs will even find and auto mount a Windows network. Pretty amazing. Reply guilherme says June 7, 2007 at 11:21 am thanks for the videos Reply Dawud Miracle says June 7, 2007 at 11:28 am guilherme, Sure. Can you believe I’ve watched the video three times??? Reply Mark Silver says June 7, 2007 at 10:48 pm Thanks for bringing this to my attention, Dawud. I’m an Apple user from back in the Apple ][+ days, and before that I first tried programming on an old IBM 5110 (with 8 inch floppy disks and a 5″ screen, what used to be called a ‘mini-computer.) I just mention that to say that I’ve watched both Apple and Microsoft grow up over the years, and I’ve been repeatedly frustrated by both: frustrated by Microsoft for the reasons you mention, and frustrated with Apple that they don’t get ‘business model.’ Apple has repeatedly released some of the most innovative hardware designs over the last 2-3 decades. And yet, because they think ‘artist’ and not ‘business’ in many cases, they hold onto proprietary rights, and miss the chance to create more love with third party creators that could’ve helped Microsoft and Apple share from each other more. They started to get it with iTunes, but I’m afraid they are going to try to hold onto the whole bag still, and lose it in this increasingly open-source world we’re living in. Ah well. On most days, I have room for my own imperfections. I guess I do for Bill and Steve, too. 🙂 Thanks again for letting my take a little retrospective tour. Reply Mark Silver says June 8, 2007 at 11:22 am It’s true, Dawud. I am happy that Apple is Apple, and you make some really good points. And, I think that sometimes the level of control they exert goes a little beyond what’s needed for system integrity, and into artistic control issues. Steve Jobs can be as extreme as Bill Gates, in his own way. Microsoft has faced anti-trust suits for trying to control everything. I’m thinking that is mirrored in Steve Jobs as well. I’m not an engineer, and I have no idea where the line lies between quality control and the tight-grip of over-control. I just suspect Apple is sometimes a little over the line. And, I’m extremely grateful as I sit here happily using my iMac. Reply Dawud Miracle says June 8, 2007 at 7:36 am Mark, In some ways I agree. But for Apple to be Apple and create what’s quite literally the best GUI OS in the world, they need proprietary control over both hardware and software. Not being able to have control over what hardware their software goes on is much of the reason Microsoft has to ship inferior products – at least from the OS perspective. Remember, Apple is writing an OS for a small, specific set of hardware which they’ve chosen for manufacturing and have thoroughly tested. Microsoft, on the other hand, has to create an operating system that sits on, quite literally, an infinite combination of hardware (motherboards, processors, graphics cards, hard drives, controllers, etc…). That means the parameters they face are far and way more complex than Apple. Which is why Windows falters again and again. There are other reasons. I think the interview clearly illustrates the difference in each’s philosophy. Microsoft is a software house, while Apple designs user experiences. Ultimately, I don’t see how one could do business differently without changing their business focus. I’m just happy that Apple is Apple. Reply Dawud Miracle says June 8, 2007 at 12:24 pm Mark, Sure. From what I’ve heard, Steve Jobs insists on absolute quality and pushes his teams to create the products you and I enjoy so much. He definitely seems to have a tight hold on Apple. But I’m fine with that as long as Apple continues to move in the directions they are. Reply Tavanza says June 28, 2008 at 8:39 pm It’s a shame to see Gates leave MS, but I also see it as a chance for the company to grow. Microsoft needs a new vision. Reply Resume says September 6, 2008 at 6:09 am Ya it is a shame to see gates leaving microsoft but i dont find any chance of keeping up the standard or would still compete in the race. I think this is the time when apple can take it to the next level as for as O.S is concerned. Reply Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment Name * Email * Website Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email.